Welcome to FoodsTrade.com
Washington to decide on bioengineered labels Tuesday

Washington to decide on bioengineered labels Tuesday

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Voters in the state of Washington have until Tuesday to send in their ballots on measure I-522 that, if passed, would require labeling for food and beverage products that use bioengineered ingredients.

According to a Politico article appearing on-line Nov. 4, a “No on 522 campaign” raised a state-record $22 million, nearly tripling the amount of money that a campaign in favor of the initiative raised. The top five contributors to the “No. on 522” campaign are the Grocery Manufacturers Association against I-522, Monsanto Co., DuPont Pioneer, Dow AgroSciences, L.L.C. and Bayer CropScience.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association, based in Washington, D.C., has said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the American Medical Association, the World Health Organization, Health Canada, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Academy of Sciences have found that bioengineered food ingredients are safe and that no negative health effects are associated with their use.

According to the G.M.A., 70% to 80% of the foods eaten in the United States contain bioengineered ingredients. The trade association added that the ingredients require fewer pesticides and less water and keep production costs down.

The G.M.A. on Oct.16 was hit with a lawsuit from Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson. The suit alleged the G.M.A. violated the state’s campaign disclosure laws when it collected and contributed more than $7 million to the “No on 522” campaign while shielding the identities of the companies that donated. In response to the lawsuit, the G.M.A. registered its political committee Grocery Manufacturers Association against I-522 and released reports related to member contributions, according to the attorney general’s office.

While the “No on 522” campaign says passing the initiative will lead to rising food prices, the “Yes on 522” campaign disputes the statement.

“Labeling genetically engineered foods would give shoppers more control over their shopping decisions,” the “Yes on 522” campaign said. “Contrary to the opposition’s claims, label updates are a routine part of the business for the food industry and should not result in additional costs to shoppers. For example, food companies re-label soda cans and cereal boxes all the time, and it doesn’t affect cost.”

The top five contributors to the “Yes on 522” campaign are Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps, Organic Consumer Fund Committee to Label GMOs in WA State, Mercola.com Health Resources, L.L.C., Presence Marketing Inc.; and Nature’s Path Foods USA Inc. According to the Politico article, the “Yes on 522” campaign raised $7.8 million.
ON  08-Nov-2013

Other Older News

Website Launching

ON  26-Aug-2013

Premium Services

ON  26-Aug-2013

Sports drink evolution

ON  29-Aug-2013

Clean label concerns

ON  30-Aug-2013

Stocks end August lower

ON  03-Sep-2013

Cott branches out

ON  06-Sep-2013

A farm bill divided

ON  20-Sep-2013

Tax drumbeat grows louder

ON  25-Sep-2013

Cocoa market in transition

ON  09-Oct-2013

On board with baby food

ON  11-Oct-2013

Making organic last

ON  11-Oct-2013

Nestle unloads Jenny Craig

ON  08-Nov-2013
FE_POST News